Nanashi
Apprentice
You think a piece of paper can't do any damage? Think again...
Posts: 72
|
Post by Nanashi on Nov 17, 2006 1:31:02 GMT -5
*Slowly backs away.*
*Backs away more quickly.*
*Turns around and sprints full speed away, using any method possible to speed up.*
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sword on Nov 17, 2006 16:46:02 GMT -5
Well, all's well that ends well. I think a Blow Job Celebration is in order, or a group jack-off, in front of the latest Homosexual Porn Video. Hey hey, c'mon. What's a minor arguement settled over anger if you make fucking comments like this? -=}N{=- |
|
|
|
Post by The Helper on Nov 17, 2006 18:53:11 GMT -5
Well, all's well that ends well. I think a Blow Job Celebration is in order, or a group jack-off, in front of the latest Homosexual Porn Video. Hey hey, c'mon. What's a minor arguement settled over anger if you make fucking comments like this? -=}N{=-Well, obviously the 'fucking' part... geez, and I thought you knew me..  |
|
|
|
Post by The Sword on Nov 17, 2006 19:16:16 GMT -5
So, I'll set this striaght, then:
All debates I am involved in are intelligent discussions, unless stated otherwise as arguements or eta.
-=}N{=-
|
|
|
|
Post by The Helper on Nov 17, 2006 19:34:57 GMT -5
So, you're implying then that as a fellow mod/helper/admin, that if I see any such activities that hints towards what may possibly be an argument, I should throw away my own perspective, and automatically assume that it is merely an intelligent conversation, and not do my job of overseeing my peers, and make no comment of it, even if I am strongly moved in my own mind that something may be wrong?
I'm not saying that you're saying this. But, I am asking if you are implying.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sword on Nov 17, 2006 19:45:10 GMT -5
If you think it's an arguement, we can debate that. Otherwise, it's a simple debate. If anyone turns it into an arguement, it will not be me.
However, as an admin, you making rape, fuck, sex, penis, masturbaition jokes, etc isn't exactly being a good admin at all. Whether you're kidding or not is irrelivant, it's still making the comment.
-=}N{=-
|
|
|
|
Post by The Helper on Nov 17, 2006 19:50:32 GMT -5
Very well then.
And that may be so, but I choose to disgust or amuse our 'RPers', instead of fighting back with anger, majority of the time.
In both ways and personalities, people could nit-pick things they like and dislike about us. However, as with both our personalities, we have our own ways of dealing with them, whether it be peacefully or otherwise.
As to my own 'jokes'... if you have any complaints, they why is it only now that you bring them up, instead of sooner? Being on the defensive is one thing, but taking the initiative to make a complaint as a player is another.
This has been debated already, if you really have to know, however, earlier in the forum's life. I made a public apology, but ironically, majority of the site found it amusing, even when I offered toning it down, removing it, or perhaps even giving up my position, and told me not to calm down.
If you truly wish to press it, I'll gladly oblige and make an apology to the younger RPers, and most others, if you truly believe I've disgusted the players of this site.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sword on Nov 17, 2006 20:00:24 GMT -5
I'm expressing no anger. As I've said, if one of my intelligent discussions becomes an arguement, it will not be me that will have made it one. A debate is not necessarily an arguement. I do not see my debates as arguements until clearly stated through anger, which I have shown none of in debates thus far.
If you believe that making sexual jokes is nothing offensive compared to the offensiveness intelligently debating, then proceed, and let me proceed. However, if you do find that somewhere along the lines that one of us jumps the gun a little, go ahead and stop whomever does. Stimmt?
-=}N{=-
|
|
|
|
Post by The Helper on Nov 17, 2006 20:08:47 GMT -5
So basically, the one that causes the concerns of the other will alert the other, and tell them to tone it down, like checks in balances in government..
*sarcasm* How I love politics..
..But, that will work, at least, a lot better then from what I've seen, which is actually the lack-of checks and balances.
Fine, I think we have a deal then.
*cums on hand and stretches it out to shake yours*
So, we're cool?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sword on Nov 17, 2006 20:20:01 GMT -5
~Shakes hands with ken-kata hand~ Deal.
-=}N{=-
|
|
Roy Atenwood
Mage
So I'm a grumpy seer? Big deal. You're an idiot.
Posts: 343
|
Post by Roy Atenwood on Nov 17, 2006 22:08:49 GMT -5
I'll delete this if it's not wanted, but I have a small opinion.....
Who cares about the younger RPers? Be realistic. Today's youth sees and hears MUCH worse than The Helper's sex jokes.
I see young children at my bus stop, and they say much worse things then The Helper.
It could just be my neihborhood, though.
Helper, stop grabbing my ass.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sword on Nov 17, 2006 22:30:48 GMT -5
No, I was just stating that Helper has to stop with his fun of sexual jokes if I have to stop with my fun in intelligent conversations and debates. We can allow them to break the rules or not, because they essentially break the same boundaries. One cannot break the rules and have the other pass, we either do it, or we don't.
-=}N{=-
|
|
Roy Atenwood
Mage
So I'm a grumpy seer? Big deal. You're an idiot.
Posts: 343
|
Post by Roy Atenwood on Nov 17, 2006 22:45:28 GMT -5
Well, personaly, I enjoy both inteligent discussion and perverted humor. It makes the world go round, as they say.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Sword on Nov 18, 2006 14:23:32 GMT -5
Exactly, but with just one, it doesn't work. I like both, but not just one.
-=}N{=-
|
|
Xia Tianku
Apprentice
Ready? Ready to see where the rabbit hole goes? Are you ready to see the end?
Posts: 16
|
Post by Xia Tianku on Nov 20, 2006 1:04:32 GMT -5
Uhm... For the record, Stimmt means True. And it doesn't really make much sense when used in this context (at least to me it doesn't). Perhaps the word "Verstehen" (understand) would've been a better choice? |
|
